Click here to watch a short video with Katherine Rundell, who writes amazing books for children and young (and older) adults.
The grandchild reads during breakfast, when sitting down with a snack after a long day at school, before and after dinner, before bedtime, in bed and basically whenever possible. Several times a week, the grandchild reads to me over social media, we then discuss the books. Currently it's Harry Potter of which I know shamefully little, book four, halfway through. The grandchild's mother, my daughter, would never leave the house without a book, never ever. One of my most vivid parenting memories is the exact moment she stopped moving her lips while reading, when I watched her book in hand, her body slipping down along the wall until she sat on the floor, totally absoberd. The book was James and the Giant Peach by Roald Dahl.
In hindsight, I retired at the right time - three years ago now. Not that it felt like the wrong time, not ever. But as my work mostly involved translating and editing science manuscripts, the arrival of AI translation and editing apps meant that almost all study groups and researchers started to use them, happy to be able to cut costs and time. It took all involved maybe six months to realise that the software was just a tool and not always up to the task. Which made my job harder and more time consuming because editing AI generated stuff most of the time meant I had to go all the way back to the source, i.e. the actual human author, to figure out what the heck they wanted to say. Not always, mind you, sometimes the software produces excellent, succint texts. Anyway, it's all in the past and I understand that most science publishers, especially the big ones, now use their own AI software to detect AI generated texts which they then reject as not original work. Go figure.
I haven't wasted much time on AI but the recent apocalyptic warnings made me laugh.
The performance of these systems involves computing power, training data and energy resources.
Software that fails to deliver the desired results or even causes damage is a not a superpower taking over the world, it is actually a faulty product, not a masterpiece. The big AI firms are producing malware on a massive scale and are attempting to shift the blame for their poor production standards onto others by warning of a fictional future apocalypse when in reality they are trying to force others to take action.
But AI does pose a very real threat to the survival of humanity. Large language models are extremely inefficient, and their now ubiquitous use is exacerbating the climate crisis. Their land use is vast, their energy and water consumption is enormous. Add to that the mass theft of copyright-protected works feeding the software, the even more rapid spread of disinformation and the financial overextension, which is beyond my understanding but I figure people are now speculating on profits that are mathematically hardly possible, risking a global economic crisis.
So there are plenty of good reasons to join forces globally to stand up to the tech giants. But none of them is a super-intelligent robot seeking to seize world domination.













.jpg)












