23 June 2026

solar energy

It's very hot, as predicted, and some of the media are in a frenzy looking for the place and time when the next record is broken. As if it's a competition. And the winner is? We are keeping the house cool the way we always did, sleeping in the basment, using the early hours for gardening and so on. It works, for now.

The solar battery is full, every gadget in the house is running on sunshine, plus we are feeding the grid and also some neighbourhood homes. I suppose it's not strictly legal, cables through gardens are involved, but the sun shines and shines for free. It's amazing what PV on a little roof space, shaded for half the day, can produce.

I am sort of walking or better call it hobbling, limping along. No more moon boot. The physio people are "optimistic", another three months give and take, they assure me. Another three months??!! But hey, I can cycle now and yes, that's brilliant. 


 

the messy garden replacing a fake quote I used

A few years ago, five tech billionaires, who shall remain anonymous, invited Douglas Rushkoff (professor of media theory and digital economics) to a luxury spa – for a fee equivalent to a third of his annual salary. 

Contrary to his expectations, the super-rich were not seeking investment advice on future technologies but instead asked about survival in the wake of a potential catastrophe, which they refered to simply as ‘the event’.

Should one flee to Alaska, New Zealand or Mars? 
Should they start securing their food supplies with special locks, the combinations to which only they knew. Or  fit their bodyguards with a sort of disciplinary collar in return for their survival at their side. And what about robots that could be used as bodyguards or labourers.

Of all people, these tech entrepreneurs whose neo-colonial production conditions are ruining entire continents now want to escape and leave the rest of humanity behind.

We have to make do with what we have, even if right now it seems completely inadequate and suboptimal, in an attempt not to resign ourselves to it, but to cope and to let our potential grow and above all, to remain committed to humanity.  Is it normal for human beings to be unable to imagine what a better world would even be like? Hopelessness isn’t natural. It needs to be produced.  

People everywhere are asking; how did we get here? Most of them say - surely it was them, those people over there that caused this. And the people over there turn and point their fingers right back at them, which results in everyone being implicated and none being responsible. But that trick will no longer work. We can no longer escape responsibility for our collective choices. This is a time of accelerated accountability for our species, not just some, but all. The age of deflection is dying away. We must all take responsibility for the state of our world because we all possess the power to change it – when we work together. But when we fail to check the recklessness and cruelty of foolish men or to shake ourselves from the fantasies that we weave around them, we all suffer the consequences of their folly. Therefore, we have become necessary allies in the unfolding of a new reality.

 Sherri Mitchell
 

 

 

27 comments:

  1. Anonymous24 June, 2026

    Fact checkers indicate Bezos never said that. What was your source? I was very alarmed and would genuinely like to know. I'm glad you're continuing to heal and can cycle again. Now that's good news! That and free sunpower. Best to you, Kim in PA (USA)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you! I double checked the sources I had (two national papers, one international one) and realised my mistake as all three have now provided redactions and excuses. I took down the quote and instead added a picture of the chaotic garden, To illustrate my state of mind, no excuses.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous24 June, 2026

      Codex
      Not your fault. Sometimes the old versions stay up. Hard to tell if they don't add corrections on the bottom.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous24 June, 2026

    Codex
    Can you post the fake quote in the comments? I wonder who did that. Competitor?
    To explain. Writing about the series the expanse, the quote fits into my concerns. I had some concerns about the links so do you still have the actual quote?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The "quote" apparently first appeared on a mock Bezos account on instragram. I am not on anything beta, but you can find it by just using the quote or bits of it in amy search engine. It was meant to be satire. The media outlets here took it for real, the international source was a print/online medium from Asia.
      I wish I wasn't that gullible but these two bits of information here are not fake:

      "D.O.J. Seeks to Halt Air Pollution Lawsuit Against xAI Data Center
      The department cited national security concerns, saying Elon Musk’s company had played a crucial role in the Iran war. It also argued it has the authority to stop environmental lawsuits brought by citizens." NYTJune 16, 2026

      "Europe must choose between AI and climate goals, data center lobby says
      Tech sector says only carbon-emitting gas plants are reliable enough today to power the EU’s AI goals." Politico June 16, 2026

      Should note that I am not keen on politico as it is owned by Axel Springer publications, which is the publisher of Germany's biggest and nastiest tabloid and has a history of compromising journalistic ethics to support right-wing causes.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous24 June, 2026

    Codex
    In case anyone is interested. Investors are dumping AI stock today.
    World we live in...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good to hear you are biking.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous24 June, 2026

    Codex thank you Sabine. What do you mean you're not on anything beta?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry, I wrote this without thinking. Beta (as in def not alpha) is a slang term here for Meta.

      Delete
  6. Anonymous24 June, 2026

    Codex more confusion
    Beta is tech talk for trying out the beta version of software not ready for the public

    Meta has several definitions

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well aware of that, I think the slang beta came originally from IT scientists (not IT tech or coders) who used to refer to their field as meta research before Zuckerb. renamed his business.

      Delete
  7. "the messy garden"
    ❤️

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous25 June, 2026

    Codex
    You probably already know but meta analysis and meta data are legitimate science terms. Zucky comes along changes the word. Genomics had to change the name of a gene because Microsoft was using it. Can't change it retroactively on papers published a decade ago.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I had read something about that meeting. Their arrogance is astounding. They truly believe they could protect themselves from the starving masses. Shock collars for their guards! Let them eat cake! I've read that these ultra rich are indeed building compounds for survival either underground or on remote islands. True or not? I imagine true. What else are they going to do with their money. All the guards in the world can't stop 5 million people.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I like your messy garden photo -- much better than a quote, even a real one, from Bezos. :)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous01 July, 2026

    Codex
    I just noticed that your federal healthminister has no medical background but is a lawyer.
    All other countries do. Any idea why?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All other countries?
      Have a look at the wikipedia page to clarify the responsibilities of the Ministry of Health, it goes beyond medical care. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Ministry_of_Health_(Germany)#Responsibilities_of_the_Federal_Ministry_of_Health

      Delete
    2. Anonymous01 July, 2026

      Codex
      I hit publish before realizing my mistake. It used to be most or they had some experience in the medical field. Any idea why it's now a lawyer with no experience?

      Delete
    3. What experience do you think she has or hasn't? Plenty of our ministers (all departments) have been legal experts in various fields, usually helpful for their ministerial portfolios.I am not keen on the current mnister but I do know that the health ministry has a big staff pool as well as affiliated committees and research institutions. No shortage of experts.
      What's your concern?

      Delete
    4. Anonymous08 July, 2026

      It's usually better 8f the health minister relies on a legal department not the other way around.

      Delete
    5. The ministry of health, at least in Germany, is responsible for more than medical issues. Or in other words: "health" covers more than medicine. Read all about it here: https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/en/ministry/tasks-and-organisation/tasks-and-organisation-of-the-federal-ministry-of-health

      Delete
  12. Anonymous08 July, 2026

    Codex
    Do you mind answering some questions?
    For the last week hearing about how imm7grants are responsible for Europe's financial situation.

    What and why now?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really don't want to even argue that. It's the classic social media rage bait and my blog is not the place. Have a look here: https://www.deutschland.de/en/topic/business/migration-skilled-labour-innovation-germany

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09 July, 2026

      Codex
      You misunderstood. Didn't want to argue or discuss. Just curious why it started again about a week ago. Any upcoming elections?

      Also which German media is neutral and factual at the moment? Can you recommend a few?

      Delete
    3. There are two upcoming elections in federal states, both in the former GDR, where the far right has a strong base and polls show high numbers for them. However, to date, they have not succeeded in secuting any leading role in local or regional parliaments and never in a federal one and they would need a coalition partner. If any of the other parties will stick to their promise of no coaltion with the far right remains to be seen. Their campaign program is heavily anti immigration etc. and full of empty promises, with proven pro Russia bias and financing. I don't wish to go into it on my blog.

      "Neutral media" is a myth and also not a requirement for a functioning democracy. The German constitution guarantees freedom of expression subject to the provisions of general legislation, the statutory provisions for the protection of young people, and the right to personal honour.
      Under German media law, there is no legal requirement of neutrality for private media. Public broadcasting, however, is subject to the requirements of objectivity and impartiality.

      These are the sources of information we use in our household, I won't list regional and local ones, of which there are thankfully still plenty:

      https://www.sueddeutsche.de/
      more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%BCddeutsche_Zeitung
      some articles behind paywall

      https://www.fr.de/
      more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurter_Rundschau

      https://taz.de/
      more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Tageszeitung

      https://correctiv.org/en/
      "CORRECTIV is a media house oriented towards the public good. We strengthen democracy through journalism, media education, and technology. As an award-winning non-profit newsroom, we shine a spotlight on power and injustices, expose disinformation, and provide arguments and methods for all those who want to participate in shaping their environment."

      regarding immigration:
      https://www.proasyl.de/en/

      beyond Germany:
      https://www.bellingcat.com/
      https://investigative-commons.org/
      https://forensic-architecture.org/
      https://www.opendemocracy.net/

      also:
      https://www.economist.com/
      https://www.ft.com/

      Delete
  13. Anonymous09 July, 2026

    Codex
    Thank you for this Sabine. Wise choice there is no point.
    Economist and FT are still reliable.

    Media landscape has changed considerably. Just looking for factual without much opinion at the moment.
    Euro news good for quick Europe news?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Couldn't say, never watch it. It was originally a completely EU financed channel but now I think owned by a Portuguese investement firm with some ties to Russia. Apparently, Orban put some money into it as well.

      Delete